data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca1fc/ca1fcebc5a7a5b59366f2c75af2e950de3d5ae01" alt=""
Soulless by Gail Carriger
A Blog with Bite January Adult Selection
Tinas quick synopsis: Soulless is a blend of Victorian romance, screwball comedy and paranormal goodies galore. Prickly Alexia Tarabotti is unmarriageable, she's also soulless, an oddity and a secret even in a 19th-century London that accepts and integrates werewolf packs, vampire hives and ghosts. Lord Maccon, an Alpha werewolf and government official, is causing many problems for Alexia…one of them being hot flashes everytime he looks at her……..another being the fact they can’t stand each other....sound familiar, yet another I hate you, NOW kiss me you fool books. After Alexia kills a vampire with her parasol, (which was hilariously funny) she and Maccon must work together to solve a supernatural mystery that grows quite steampunkly (is that a word?) romantic.
The world-building in Soulless was clever and well written in regards to creating steampunk London; the visual detail really put you in this crazy world, though I didn’t connect to the paranormal aspect Carriger tried to create. I loved the British dialog but the mixing of Jane Austin meets Buffy the Vampire Slayer didn’t work for me. Perhaps I’m in a foul mood today, because my love going into Soulless dried up after page 100. The dialog to me became verbose and all of Alexia’s funny quirks that I liked in the beginning of the story got on my nerves towards the end of the book.
I did enjoy the love story between Alexia and Maccon, it was like reading about Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett only Ninja style with mad skills. The book was very humorous, yet I felt the mixture of plots were competing against each other. It was hard to immerse myself in this environment because the story couldn't decide if it was a love story, a gothic story, a paranormal story, a British humor story or a book all about Alexia's prominent nose. Is there a problem with olive skinned, dark haired women in England or something??????
Every author puts their own spin on concepts of vampires and werewolves, and for the most part she sticks to the basics (like blood and undead) she adds her own flare to things - like how vampires have influenced fashion and I quote, "pale, my dears is very much in"….ugh- vampires with fashion how delightful!! I think I prefer the sparkly ones next to high society vamps. Not all the paranormal aspects were bad, I loved the werewolves in this and Alexia's gifts as a soul sucker kicked major how do I say this...Arse....I'm so not up to date on my British lingo, I've begged my husband to speak in a British accent...its so sexy....he won't do it...shucks.......guess all those Brit actors will have to do it for me.....
The book was a quick read and at points very fun, I like my paranormal edgy so this didn't deliver for me...... Steampunk and British culture fans will have a blast with this one….hard core paranormal junkies- it’s a toss-up.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5596/c559600b9013020f779613940758bae95758cbb9" alt=""
3/5 Paranormal, steampunk, gothic love story
Join the discussion at The Blog with Bite
1.With the rise in popularity of steampunk trends, do you think the dialog and environment created in Soulless fitting within the paranormal genre?
No- the reason being, I couldn't connect the steampunk with the society and the paranormal. Perhaps I like my PR dark and edgy and intense, I thought this was more of a comedy.
2.For better or worse, Soulless throws together a lot of unconventional story elements. What ones worked for you? What ones didn't? Will you be reading the next book in the series, Changeless?
I liked the love story, and the whole society Carriger created, but I couldnt connect them all to the paranmoral world, it was funny for a few hours then I just lost my interest......I will not read Changeless.
3.The comedic tone of the novel was ever present even when the novel was at it's darkest plot-threads. Do you think this added to the depth of the novel and characters or did it trivialize the plot? For me it was trivialized, and thats why I thought the paranormal threads didn't work, thunking a vampire on the head with a parasol....(funny, but not typical vampire genre)
3.The comedic tone of the novel was ever present even when the novel was at it's darkest plot-threads. Do you think this added to the depth of the novel and characters or did it trivialize the plot? For me it was trivialized, and thats why I thought the paranormal threads didn't work, thunking a vampire on the head with a parasol....(funny, but not typical vampire genre)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0aa62/0aa62f14e80249b22bf9187b7d11c7d7c0be5f6f" alt=""
This sounds so good! Great review...as always! :)
ReplyDeletegreat review too.
ReplyDeleteSounds really good. Nicely reviews. Steampunk seems to be In thing in YA lit these days
ReplyDeleteGreat honest review. I think I'll pass on this book.
ReplyDeleteI liked this book. Although I don't understand all the raving reviews. I found the setting and Lord Macoon and Tarabotti's banter was what kept my interest.
ReplyDeleteBack in that time I do believe there was a stereotype against larger noses as well as darker skin tones. That's why the woman looked so pale, lighter skin was supposed to be more beautiful.
Ah...too bad! You say you liked this one, but didn't love it. I myself adored it. It was perfect for me. But then I'm always a little biased towards a book that will make me laugh aloud - and the dialogue certainly did that. Just shows that everyone experiences books in different ways, eh?
ReplyDeleteMy favorite line from your review - "like reading about Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett only Ninja style with mad skills." Great stuff!